[Video Transcript]
Guys,
We started talking about this last week, but we’ll say it again:
Contents
Slide 01 – We participate in a soul
So remember what we talked about here. We saw examples of consciousness, showing that consciousness does not have just one feature, it is volumetric.
- It starts with a point, which is the maximum point of contraction, which we can organize here as an atom.
- Right after that there is a line, this line we are going to develop the molecules. This molecule will have attraction as a characteristic, the atom will have movement as a characteristic.
- Then it makes a new line, this line then forms the vegetable, which will have sensitivity as a characteristic. The vegetable already has sensitivity.
- Then it develops a perpendicular line that will form the animal field, which will have instinct as its main characteristic.
- And then it will make a new line where there is a human conscience. This rational conscience of which we are attached to it and at this moment of our evolutionary phase we are in it, but as it deepens it becomes volumetric.
It is in the volumetric process of consciousness that we will have intuition.
That’s why the view of those who are in intuition is totally different from those who are in reason. Reason will have a view by analysis and intuition will have a general view.
When you take, for example, the apocalypse of Saint John, he has an intuitive vision, the angels always speak to him like this: ‘Come, go up and see’.
It is exactly this “Come, go up and see” that means the intuitive field. That is, instead of seeing through analysis, instead of studying through analysis, you see through a general vision.
How to understand this?
Pietro Ubaldi has a nice example, he says this: Think of someone who is in a forest, and he takes it and walks inside that forest, as he walks, he analyses the terrain, analyses the water, analyses the leaves, he analyses the trees and draws conclusions about how the forest as a whole should be.
So he doesn’t know the size of the forest, he doesn’t know the number of trees the forest has, but he knows perfectly well what conclusion he can reach by analysis in order to try to define a general law .
Now he takes someone flying and approaches this forest, it sees the ground, sees the river, sees the size of the forest, sees the characteristics of the forest, sees the main trees, and that he sees from above.
This view from above is the intuitive view, and the view by analysis is the view that you walk through the forest.
So this is how happens within the process of the vision of volumetric consciousness. As you support this, you will see.
(Professor shows the Rubik’s cube) So, logically, we begin to understand that consciousness is several little blocks of this one that are interacting. If you get super consciousness, it’s already volumetric. Then comes the consciousness superior to this, which will be two little blocks of this united.
Then you will understand how consciousness expands and how the vision of one field is totally different from the other.
We also showed that within our dual consciousness, it has (Professor shows the cube) a personality phase, which is this red frame and this red frame is dual, it has both forces, it is always dual.
Remember that the life is always dual.
There is the collective field, which is also dual, but there is a unitary field, which, as the author will call cosmic consciousness, will call it a field of law.
(Professor shows the cube) So, this white boy here is the cosmic consciousness, it is not dual, it is unitary, it is totally good.
And up here we can say that it’s the field of the system, the interaction between the system and the field of cosmic consciousness is what we call grace. So the interplay between the system and the anti-system, between cosmic consciousness, the end point of evolution, in terms of the anti-system and the systemic consciousness is grace. Then grace is to everyone.
(Professor shows the cube) It is exactly this field here that does not let us jettison anyone because the collective field we all live of it, it also does not let anyone jettison. It is exactly this awareness here that unifies everything.
That is why the right to judge does not belong to us
We have the right to analyse in order to understand in order to become aware and help, but we do not have the right to judge.
That’s why Jesus was so clear: As you judge, you will be judged. We do not have the right to judge.
So, consequently, as it does not belong to us, it belongs to the right of analysis so that you can analyse it in order to better reflect on yourself and the process in which you need to help, but it does not belong to judge.
(Professor shows the Rubik’s cube) This soul then does not let us jettison anyone, it is to this soul that we belong, it is to this collective group that we belong, and individuality receives the reflection of this process.
When I talk about individuality here, always remember that I’m talking about individualism because individuality is where we are returning. We are still in the ego phase.
So, consequently, there is no way because the law that governs us is exactly this law from above.
That’s why Pietro Ubaldi defines sin as it is there in Paul’s Epistles as everything that is contrary to divine law, that is, everything that is contrary to that law that is already in our conscience in a latent state, it is already there and it manifests itself in our consciousness.
(Professor shows cube) This is where the struggle arises, the struggle does not arise only because of the duality here that marks us, it does not arise only here that hinders us, but it arises here because here is the field of ideas. This field here coincides a lot with what Plato explains, the archetypal field, the superior field, the city of God, as Saint Augustine says.
(Professor shows cube) I mean, this field up here which is a field, which whether or not it is in our soul, is latent, it is in our unconscious.
And within that vision that we always talk about: Unconsciousness does not mean that there is no action, what we do not have is perception, but it is acting in our soul.
That’s why this clash between these forces, these clashes between these forces that gives this condition.
You see Jesus who already lived here going here (points in the cube), he makes it clear: “I will not judge you either”, when he talks to the woman. That is, the judgment does not belong to him.
He could at the time even say: I could judge, but it is not up to me to judge. Judgment only belongs to the father.
So what we can do is a analysis so that there is a correction of our destinies and help others, but not judge.
During class someone asks:
I would like to understand it like this, which field of the system would be unique? I didn’t understand about it, you said the cosmic field also has this uniqueness, it doesn’t have duality, how?
Teacher replies:
The system is not a field because the system is not vibrational, remember I showed that here? The intrinsic system, it fills all of us. So the system is everywhere, it’s like it’s divine omniscience and omnipresence, so it’s not a field because it’s not vibrational.
It is intrinsic, it is non-local, it is within us.
(Teacher shows cube) These other fields here are all vibrational fields and these fields are one field within another.
The best way to understand it is to understand an onion, it’s like an onion, several fields: We have a field of cosmic consciousness, then we have the superior fields, of totality, unity, we have the collective fields of thought, then we have the thought fields, the family fields, the group fields, the nation fields, all of that is like an onion.
And we are surrounded by these fields and by these vibrations.
All these forces are drained by our personality. So our personality is a system of forces and this system of forces is pronounced in our life.
Let’s assume, for example, of the millions of existing forces you can already consciously drain 5% of these forces, the rest of the forces act in your unconscious, and manifest when you filter, when you tune in, when you reverberate.
It is for this reason that our mind, as I showed you here last week, it gets stuck with the same images because you get used to it only in the field of consciousness that you have already opened.
It is what Emmanuel calls the Field of Awakened Consciousness.
A point of consciousness that you’ve already awakened, you stay in it, so you’re used to doing the same analyses, you’re used to doing the same kind of reasoning, you’re used to making the same kind of accusations to yourself, you’re used to doing the same same type of reporting, you don’t change.
Since you don’t change this content, it doesn’t flow.
So it flows through dissatisfaction, which is why dissatisfaction is the basis of the evolutionary process.
Insatiability and dissatisfaction.
That is, the insatiability that doesn’t let you stop, you always want more, you always seek. Initially in the material field, which is where you are, then in the psychic field, then in the field of knowledge, then in the field of intellect, then in the field of the spirit, but you keep looking.
So the insatiability never leaves you still and when you stop, the depression crises come, the anguish crises come, the sadness crises come, there’s no way to stop because the insatiability of desire is the mark of the evolutionary process.
(Professor shows cube) So you keep going because in fact you want to get here and when you get here you want to come back here, so consequently you seek this all the time, hence the insatiability of desire.
Slide 02 – The excluded person is represented later by other person in the field
(Teacher reads slide)
“The collective conscience obeys a basic law: No one who has belonged to the system can be excluded from it. None of them can be denied the right to belong to the system. What happens when, nevertheless, this happens?
Then the excluded person is represented, later, by another member of the system, and the destiny becomes for him. For example, a previous husband is represented by a son in the mother’s previous marriage. Then this son may behave like a rival to his father, as he unconsciously represents his mother’s first husband. The solution is to recognize the first husband as a member of this system.”
What happens? If the universe is a hologram, all people are contained within us.
That’s why it’s possible to do ho’oponopono for those who know ho’oponopono, that’s why it’s possible to do interaction and vibration at a distance for people because the contents of all people are also contained in us.
If this is a force, what is a field? A field, by quantum theory, means that the field is a representation of a force that quantum physics can also be within duality, wave or particle. So it is representative of a force.
Therefore, if I say, for example, the electromagnetic field, you have the electromagnetic force, and the photon that is smaller than that energy field, we can say that it represents that force and that force is active.
if I take a vibrating field and a mental field that also acts sometimes as a wave, sometimes as a particle, we can also speak of a mental photon, as André Luiz says.
So this force is a living force that is within the field. That living force will find a field to drain, so to be able to flow, to be able to act.
Let’s assume, for example, that we have an ex-husband who is disowned, this happens a lot.
You take the ex-husband and kill him. So much so that people call him deceased, the guy is alive, but you call him deceased, you try to kill this relationship.
And many times, within the family there are children, many times there are connections that cannot be ended. We are interconnected, we try to exclude and the law of reincarnation itself, it is inclusive.
Let’s get there, as I already mentioned here, the book Fifty Years Later (Chico Xavier, By Emmanuel), you’ll get there those people who lived two thousand years ago and committed crimes against each other, they then group themselves in the spiritual plane in the field of friendship, family and reincarnate again to be able to rebuild.
Then the oblivion is a blessing because it works as a starting point. Now, when you don’t do this process, that vibration will belong to the system, it will act and when it finds someone, that someone will work as a medium for that system.
Let’s suppose, for example, that I have a son from the second marriage with the husband from the second marriage and that son suddenly begins to take a very strong position in the father, beyond the personality processes, that is, beyond the processes of the personalities will be acting the collective field in him.
So let’s assume that the son has a grudge against his father, so the anger he is having towards his father represents, for example, 30% of the content, the other 20% is linked to past reincarnation processes, the other 30% is related to field.
That’s why I called our course Psychic Constellation, because it goes far beyond the family constellation. That is, it means all the forces that constellate in the field of personality.
So, when you study a problem, you cannot study just one direction. It’s no use talking like this: It’s a past life thing. Calm down, it can be a thing from the past life in a certain percentage.
That is, within the past life there is something around 30%, we have in the current life due to traumas, sorrows, problems, 20%, we have the family complex 30%.
So there are the most different forces that are acting, there are the most different ways that it is being maintained and that often lead to a process of revolt, lead to a process of opposition.
So every time we go to study these forces we have to be careful in studying them.
That is why treatment is never unidirectional, it is never a single system.
You will often have to take that person and help them work internally to overcome the contents of aversion that they have, psychologically the traumas that are often there providing imbalance, you will have to work the family field to order those family forces, it is to order family forces in order to make one flow in a more adequate way.
It will have to provide conditions for the individual to fully improve himself so that he changes his tune, changes his process. So you see it’s global involvement.
That’s why the treatment is a careful treatment, it’s a treatment that we always have to do in the direction of self-knowledge so that it can give results and many times we are going to work with millenary forces, forces many times that have been in the family field for a long time, centuries.
So we have to take this view so that we can understand our tendencies, our personal issues, our intimate procedures.
That’s why the proper way is to honour, is to honour the ex-husband within the family. In the word honour it means to accept, not to exclude, not to judge, not to condemn.
When we do this, you start ordering the flow, you start ordering the order. Put it like this: Every exclusion is like a wall, that flow will come and hit the wall and cause a series of consequences. But every time you accept this process it flows.
During class someone asks:
We are talking about the field and at the same time we are saying that we are all interconnected, including at the various levels of evolution: animal, mineral, vegetable.
When you, I won’t say exclude, but when you attack an animal or when you kill an animal, we still kill to eat, how does that resonate with us?
Teacher replies:
Emmanuel in the book O Consolador (The Comforter) says that animal feeding is a mistake, which humanity could already overcome, but which it still has not managed to overcome due to the economic problems involved in this issue. But humanity, with the resources it has in intelligence, could already having as food a lot of things that would replace the need for people to live off animals.
I believe that as we evolve, our understanding of animals and the understanding of kingdoms inferior to us, I’m not just talking about animals, plants too, everything, becomes a greater understanding.
So much so that we have a movement today that is ecological, an ecological movement that these nations are already ventilated, they are already talked about, there are many people fighting for the preservation of this, that, an environment, a place, a park, a situation, of a forest.
It already exists and this notion begins to penetrate our soul.
So I believe that as this happens, life in the future will already be one of respect, it will already be one of care.
As we begin to take some actions in this direction today.
That’s the evolution that is going to make.
Slide 03 – Love your neighbour as yourself
(Teacher reads slide)
“Therefore, the first law of collective conscience reads like this: everyone who is part of the system has the right to be part of it; exactly the same right as everyone else.”
Remember when we said here that our evolution takes place in three planes: The first plane is the plane of individualism that evolves towards individuality, the plane of evolution from the ego to the self. So this is the first plane and Jesus gave the law of this plane when he asserts, “Ye are gods.” And when He talks the way to do that: “Let your light shine.”
So, it is the development of the shadow of what we are due to the fall to the enlightenment process, from ego to self, from individualism to individuality.
This is the process of evolution and this is done through self-knowledge, self-enlightenment, self-certification.
So this is the process that we do internally and through creative effort. I always like to emphasize, it is not simply a mental effort, it is not creating an image of us and starting to compare what we are and staying in this struggle between the image of what I compare of what I am with the image that I created. But no, it is a creative effort that becomes self-aware of both its potentialities and its defects and lets the divine force act in us.
That’s why Jesus made it clear: ‘Let your light shine, you are gods’.
The second process is the collective.
So I evolve individually and I evolve collectively. The basis of the process of collective evolution is ‘I and others’.
The law of this process is to love your neighbour as yourself, that is the law.
Jesus made this law very clear, it is the law that governs the process of collective evolution.
And Bert Hellinger says: The first law of the collective conscience is that nobody can be excluded, just as the first law of individuality says that only through self-knowledge you rise, through your own effort.
It is what Jesus says: Seek and you will find, knock and it will be opened to you.
It’s always an action, it’s always an effort, it’s always a search, the inner proposition in the sense of movement.
The second is nobody can be excluded. So that’s the law.
So it’s no use. We are going to have to solve our problems starting from the person and not from a mental conviction because what excludes are the mental images that we form whether they are virtual or real.
“I do not accept this conduct and put it out”, “I do not accept that you are like that”, “I do not accept that you make mistakes like that”, “I do not accept” and you exclude.
When you make the exclusion you create a problem for the whole system and for you too. Veneranda assures us she also mentions it in a message from her and Bittencourt Sampaio spoke a lot about this also, he says the following: ‘We are a caravan that never unhooks and we’ll have to go together’.
It’s no use. Whoever we leave behind, we’ll have to look for.
During class someone asks:
Mauricio, please, if it is possible, address the influence of the paternal and maternal personality in the formation of our personality.
Teacher replies:
Let’s talk about that since we are talking about the collective.
Pietro Ubaldi has a way of approaching personality that is much more precise than Bert Hellinger’s, but he shows this process much more broadly.
(Drawing on the blackboard) So, he says that our current personality, which I’ll call CP here, so in this case, Mauricio’s personality, in my case.
This personality is formed by forces, as I have already mentioned here.
I like to think of these forces as a game of sticks, remember those old sticks? So, the stick game, if we take the sticks they are black, red, yellow, blue.
So let’s think, for example, that our psyche is made up of forces like those sticks. Forces that are black, blue forces, red forces, yellow forces and that are within our soul.
According to Ubaldi, these forces are constituted as follows: Paternal forces, maternal forces, the environment and the spirit.
The spirit is covered by the field of the soul, which are the previous personalities, personality 1, personality 2, personality 3, personality 4, and so on, our various incarnations.
(Drawing on the blackboard) So when there is fertilization, there is not only fertilization in the physical sense of the spermatozoon that unites with the egg. The spermatozoon has an aura and the ovum has an aura.
So, consequently, if the universe is a hologram, the psychic contents of the father are here and the psychic contents of the mother are here.
It is for this reason that only the presence of the father and mother who have the same vibration that constitutes us will give us balance.
You can receive this from someone else, for example, an adopted child will receive it from a surrogate father, from a surrogate mother, from a mother at heart, as we usually say, but only the father and the mother are genuinely similar.
That’s why you take a child who, many times as a baby, left for Sweden, grew up in another reality, grew up in another country with a father and mother and when he turns 40, he discovers that it is not his biological mother, he travels, he comes to Brazil, he goes to the favela to meet his mother and when he sees the mother he cries because at that moment it is the only force that fully compensates him because it is made up of the same content.
These forces grow and as you grow, one force becomes predominant and another force becomes a satellite.
So if the predominant force is the father, everything that the father does in the family or does in life fundamentally affects the child. That is why parents, children of the same father and the same mother will have different memories and contents in relation to the family.
One can arrive and say: ‘It was great, wow, my family was beautiful’.
And the other will say: ‘no, it was hell, my life is hell, my father was like that…’
Why?
Because it will bind with the strength of his father or mother.
These forces become satellites to one another and this satellite can be 50, 60, 40, it can be 30, 90, 10, 99.9, 0.1 which will predominate these forces and these forces are based on affinity.
When the spirit that governs the reincarnation process enters the psychic field, by affinity it attracts these forces that will form the maternal force and the paternal force.
So, as we grew up, these forces manifested themselves, so when we talk about the equality that often exists between the father and the son, it’s not a genetic issue, it’s also a matter of psychic heredity, they are forces that make us up.
Together with these forces we have the forces of the environment
And this environment ranges from the environment that we create and that we live in, be it social or family, to the fields that we are studying here, it includes everything.
(Drawing on the blackboard) And up here is the field of the other personalities that we had in past lives, the personalities that will act within us, and these personalities act in the way that I drew here: The virtual and real images.
(Drawing on the blackboard) And above all this is the field of the spirit, which is a systemic field, which will be pronounced by grace and will be pronounced by cosmic consciousness.
These are the forces that make us, the basic forces that make us.
(Drawing on the blackboard) Now, consequently, the paternal strength within it will be the maternal strength, the strength of the paternal grandmother, the strength of the paternal grandfather, understood?
So, Bert Hellinger, with the work that he starts and develops, which is the family constellation, he discovered a way to work these forces, which in the past was only worked on a personal, individual content.
He found a way, and he himself speaks of revealing the occult, that is, he found a way to work these forces and these forces are rooted in our psyche.
I’m going to teach a class about it later.
Slide 04 – Honour father and mother
(Teacher reads slide)
“The first law of the collective conscience states that no one can be excluded. There is a second important law. In the sphere of influence of this collective conscience, older members have more rights than younger members. And the younger ones cannot meddle in the affairs of the older ones.”
So, if it is an order, there is a hierarchy and this hierarchy is so important that if you go to the ten commandments it will be there: Honour father and mother.
It doesn’t discuss what father and mother did. It’s honouring father and mother.
When Jesus goes to invite the young man to follow him, he says this: Keep the commandments. And he says: Lord, I already do.
So if you already keep the commandments, go there, sell everything you have, give to the poor, come and follow me. That’s when the young man says: Whoa.
But he says: I already do, that is, honouring father and mother, he doesn’t say the reason if the father made a mistake, if he didn’t make a mistake, no, the word is honour.
So he shows that there is a hierarchical process and we have to be aware of this hierarchical process and at the same time it is not up to us to penetrate the lives of our grandparents or our parents.
Emmanuel has a sentence that goes similar to this notion, he says the following: In the same way that parents cannot interfere or interfere in the future of their children, children cannot interfere or penetrate the parents’ past.
And we think that our parents past is free, that we can go there and search, and talk and move. Look how many disturbances we cause and many times we will face it because people will represent these figures within our family.
So, the two laws: First law of the collective world: No one can be excluded. Second: There is a hierarchy from which the process of honour exists.
When I say honour, it doesn’t mean that I have to agree with my father’s and mother’s whims, but honouring means understanding, it’s not experiencing whims, no, but I understand that it’s whims, but that doesn’t mean I diminish or treat them badly.
(Drawing on the blackboard) So there is a hierarchy, within this hierarchy the first marriage is more representative than the second and so on. That is, honour must be maintained here so that there is harmony here and harmony here.
The father and the mother, the grandparents have a superior hierarchy to the father and the mother.
That’s why James speaks so well in his Epistle: ‘He who does not take care of his own and his family has denied the faith.’
Because it is a hierarchical process, of respect, honour, care and, above all, love. So it’s not exclusion, the whole process of exclusion will disturb the field.
(Drawing on the blackboard) So what will happen? I exclude that field from those who were excluded will disturb the field and someone will assimilate. This makes it the spokesperson for this force.
Slide 05 – Love has an order
(Teacher reads slide)
“The daily life of many families shows that it is not enough for us to love each other. Love also needs an order, so that it can develop. This order is pre-established for us. Only when we know something about the commands of love can we overcome the obstacles that, despite the good will of everyone involved, often stand in our way.”
Logically, this order can be an intertwined hierarchy.
What is an intertwined hierarchy?
It’s what Jesus said: ‘Whoever wants to be the greatest, let him be the smallest; whoever wants to be first must be servant to all.’
Consequently this is an order, an order of intertwined hierarchy, but this order is not rigid, but has to be respected.
You can, for example, a request from your father or mother, you do not comply, but it does not mean that you will disrespect, it does not mean that it will hurt, it does not mean that you will be harsh, it does not mean that you will bring exclusion content . You can simply say: Look, in my life I will not accept this content and I will follow it differently.
Ah, the mother cries, makes a fuss, more likely domineering mothers. All right, I’ll understand that she’s like that, but that’s not why I’m going to exclude her, that’s not why I’m going to stop seeing her, that’s not why I’m going to feel bad, as it happens, that’s not why I’m going to let her to talk to her, that doesn’t mean she won’t penetrate my family anymore, that doesn’t mean I won’t go to her house anymore, and so on.
It’s a mature process, it doesn’t mean that I’m going to be ready and welcome every whim, but it does mean that I’m not going to exclude it.
Slide 06 – Love is the fundamental law of the universe
(Teacher reads slide)
“Love is a part of the order. Order precedes love, and love can only develop within it. The order pre-exists. When I reverse this relationship and intend to change the order through love, I am doomed to fail. It does not work. Love adapts to an order and thus can flourish, just as the seed adapts to the soil and grows and prospers there.”
The fundamental law of the system and the anti-system is the law of love. This is the primordial law, the supreme law, the law that directs everything.
That’s why Jesus was clear: All laws and all prophets are summed up in love.
And what is the second principle? It’s the order. One of the expressions of this order is justice.
This is the second principle, in fact, it comes after love. It’s not like Bert Hellinger says. It comes after love, but there is an order through which this love flows.
Order is a basic process of life.
So much so that one of the main characteristics of the universe that is most discussed today is the order that exists in the universe.
Even the chaos within him has order, at the heart of chaos there is order. Today it is one of the scientific concepts that exists, that is, order is a basic principle.
After order comes freedom, which will give free will as a principle.
We can talk here: Love, order, freedom. It is this principle that characterizes our life whether in the system or in the anti-system.
That’s why when we talk about evolution we talk about a hierarchy ordered by the gain of love.
What makes one spirit different from another? Putting here (Drawing on the blackboard) spirit in the sense of individuality. It is exactly the conquest in the field of love.
So the more we walk towards love the more we walk towards order, this order is what Pietro Ubaldi calls law and what we call here cosmic consciousness, which directs all contents.
It’s what the information field means to someone reading the book The Field. It’s that law, that order that directs everything.
So, if there is an order, it needs to flow, in the sense of love, in the sense of affection, in the sense of kindness. It is not flowing in the sense of obedience as one obeys a king in the absolutist sense.
Slide 07 – Only in the inner search we will find the harmony
(Teacher reads slide)
“We know that inner harmony is not an article of supply and demand in earthly markets, but spiritual acquisition only accessible in the temple of the Spirit.”
So we put this passage by André Luiz here to say within those constitutions that we studied here of the personality, only in the field of the spirit, that is, only in the inner world, only in this inner search we will find this harmony and the spirit will express love and order.
Slide 08 – There is no way to live without conflict.
(Teacher reads first part of the slide)
“Conflicts happen every day. They arise when we need to impose ourselves. They help us to grow, to find better solutions, to expand our borders. Therefore, ultimately, they contribute to security and peace. These are the small conflicts. They are familiar to us.”
Who lives without conflict?
There’s no way, we live in an improving world, we live in an evolving world, we live in a world where there are different human types in different fields of evolution.
So, there is no way to live without conflict.
People often want to live without conflict and there is no possibility of that. We live all the time we solve problems, there is no way to live without conflict.
The person often thinks that closing the room, getting depressed, saying that he/she is sick so that no one can bother him, that he will live without conflict. But no, he will live in an intimate conflict that he is generating.
So conflict is a necessary condition of life and conflict solutions, we solve a conflict to have another.
That’s what I joke: Happiness is the break between two pains.
It’s exactly like that, that is, you resolve conflicts in the role you perform, inside your home, inside your house.
You will always be at the side of a conflict because we are all moving towards harmonization, we are still far from it, we have not yet discovered the field of the spirit within us, we are groping in this world. So it is natural that conflict is the basis of life.
(Teacher reads second part of the slide)
“Behind them, however, there are conflicts of a very different type, since a will to extermination is at work in them. They involve extremes: life or death, survival or extinction. These are the big conflicts.”
What is the big conflict?
It’s the one that makes you want to kill.
This will to extermination. It is this will to exterminate that excludes, many times it doesn’t kill physically, but it kills psychically.
So this will to exterminate that is in the soul, this will that you often say like this: Ah, the guy did this, let’s do the same thing with him.
It is what generated, for example, the “Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth”, is the will to exterminate.
And even when that person is socially condemned, socially taken to the correction process, you don’t accept it because you actually want extermination, it’s the desire to kill that we disguise.
You say: I don’t want him to die, but I want him to disappear from my life. But how will it disappear?
“From now on he is invisible to me”, don’t you have these phrases?
“I was so disappointed that I never want to see that person again”,
This is what we see a lot nowadays in religious concepts.
The person says: No, I don’t want any revenge for him, what is his is kept, God will act.
I mean, God who will be your avenger.
So, this desire for extermination that we transfer to life or transfer it to us or transfer it to society or transfer it to God, but somehow we will be avenged and this desire for extermination will be satisfied.
During class someone asks:
You’re talking about exclusion, there’s the family field and you have an ex-husband and you want to exclude, then you previously showed that the field will be unbalanced, there will be someone in that family nucleus who will assimilate that unbalanced field, but can this be a nephew, an uncle?
Teacher replies:
A son. It’s usually in your family.
Student asks:
But like this, is it always a closer person?
Teacher replies:
Ever. It will be in your family.
Student asks:
Could it be brother?
Teacher replies:
No, it will be inside your house, for example, a nephew who lives with you, a son.
Slide 09 – Eye for an eye and the world goes blind
(Teacher reads slide)
“When we look inside ourselves, we soon recognize how many times we wish, in our hearts, that “justice” would be done to certain people, such as certain criminals, or we wish evil, and even the worst, to the people who have wronged us. With this, the same movement manifests itself in our soul that, in other contexts, causes wars and disputes, which damages people and leads them to ruin.”
So it’s the same principle of war.
The guy did something there and only with debt of blood to be able to solve the problem.
That’s why, for example, we don’t take the initiative to solve penitentiary problems, a prison problem that Brazil has, for example.
Inhumanity is how we treat people who condemn themselves.
When prison should be a school of rehabilitation and care, it actually becomes a way of massacring the other and we don’t care because they deserve what they have, isn’t what we say?
This is how we still think and the reason why we don’t do any transformations.
I have never heard, for example, except when the person finds himself, that a prisoner is rehabilitated because most of the time he either dies or goes to a worse school than the one he entered.
This is the reason why this process still predominates in us here, the desire for extermination that has exclusion as one of its parameters.
We have to understand the pain.
We are not going to exclude because we have to understand the pain.
Because losing a child within the conditions, for example, as was the tragedy of Santa Maria (fire at the Kiss nightclub), is a profound pain.
Have no doubt that it is a deep pain and that through solidarity, through affection, work is being done that has to be done.
People who made mistakes in relation, for example, to what happened in Santa Maria, even within the law of karma, they will have to assume the consequences.
When you understand, when you don’t exclude it doesn’t mean that you are preventing others from receiving the consequences of the act itself, justice is there for that.
Now, desiring justice is not what we are talking about here.
Let’s say, for example, that I want justice, but I want whoever caused it to die, whoever caused it to go to hell, whoever caused it to disappear, to be avenged, to be tortured.
Wanting justice in the sense that the consequences of our actions, our choices are punished within human law it is ok, because this is a consequence of the acts that each person has to assume, but the desire of extermination that is often linked to this process is wrong.
So many times you say: No, the person is sentenced to 15 years in jail.
And we say: only that, that is not enough.
Guys, have you ever thought of staying indoors for a month, without leaving the house, under house arrest? Have you ever seen how sad it is when you’re on top of a bed, when you’re unable to get out, have you seen how you feel?
Now you deprive yourself of the most important gift of the soul, which is the gift of freedom, and you think it’s not much 10 years, you think it’s not enough 15 years old, you think it’s little 20 years.
Then you say: But there are certain people who cannot live in society.
I agree, so we have to provide conditions to re-educate them because that person goes back and forth in the reincarnation process.
Then he says: There will be people who will have to be sentenced to life imprisonment.
So let it be a perpetual school, not a prison as it is, be a school because anyway I am working on this spirit because it will return, there is no way, it will return.
Tomorrow he’s 16 years old, 15 years old, committing a worse crime than in his past life. So he has to treat it, there is no point in excluding it.
I have to treat this being and the best form of treatment is treatment that leads to rehabilitation through school, and when I say school here I mean school in the global sense, educational school.
Slide 10 – ‘The good conscience’
(Teacher reads slide)
“For the great conflicts are sustained by the conviction that we are in the right or, in other words, by a good conscience. The danger that surrounds a good conscience is evident from the fact that it sustains, on both sides, homicidal conflicts, which drain it of its energy.”
Let’s save this because I think it’s one of the greatest things about Bert Hellinger.
The good conscience he is talking about is the one you think is right and excludes the other. You are 100% right, that is where the great conflicts arise.
You’re going to take Jew and Palestinian, both are absolutely right.
If you take this process that many times some Muslims are generating in the world, they will think it is right.
The American invading certain countries thinks he is right because that is the good conscience, you exclude the other and the reason is always with you.
At most, it’s: Okay, I got it wrong here, let’s move on.
This is what generates conflicts and you cannot see it because you always think you are in the power of reason, then it generates a good conscience that you say: I am good and the other is bad.
You project your whole shadow onto him and it happens collectively, it happens in several processes.
Do you want to see a collective example of this very cool? It’s the French Revolution.
I am reading a book on the French Revolution which is very interesting.
The people threw in the monarchy, mainly Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the whole process of shadow of the population. So let’s kill the king until we manage to kill the king, we killed the aristocratic figures and when it was over there was no one else to kill and started killing each other, it was the time of terror. When it ended, everyone who generated the revolution and everyone who was inside the camp was killed and returned to absolutist power again.
Why? Because it is a shadow projection.
The other is 100% wrong and I am 100% right.
It is those quarrels that often happen to the couple for years. The person says: We’ve been married for 40 years, we’ve been fighting for 39.5 years. Only in the first five months we didn’t fight that much, that is, 40 years of fighting.
No one gives in because the other is wrong, the other is right. So there is no deal, 39.5 years of fighting.
This will, this process is what excludes, this process that gains one of the great traumas and one of the great problems in the family field.
And even when you talk like this: ‘No, I’m trying to harmonize, but I’m right, I’m giving in’.
This is the good conscience, which as Bert Hellinger says: The biggest problem in the world is the “righteous”.
Slide 11 – It is this will to exterminate that is in our soul and that transforms the other into an adversary
(Teacher reads slide)
“Every major conflict is meant to get something out of the way. Ultimately, it wants to destroy you. Behind these conflicts there is a will to extermination. What forces or fears does it feed on? – It feeds mainly on the will to survive.
When our life is threatened, we react by fleeing, avoiding being exterminated by the other, or by aggression, trying to liquidate him or, at least, put him to flight. Getting the adversary out of the way is the extreme of the will to extermination.”
It generates the defence mechanisms of the personality.
Rejection leads to escape, rejection leads to sublimation, and these mechanisms where we live for not being able to face them and many times we really want to exclude, exclude a daughter, exclude a son, all of this exists in our life .
This extermination desire to take out the opponent, to transform the other into an opponent.
Remember that we already gave several classes in the last course about the adversary that is inside our soul.
This desire for extermination that makes these traffic fights often end in death, which makes the other become aggressive in such a way that he loses his senses, it is an enormous aggressiveness because he loses his senses, takes the revolver and shoots, injuring people that has nothing to do with it.
It is this will to exterminate that is in our soul and that transforms the other into an adversary. We have to be very careful with it because we must have already exercised it countless times in past incarnations, it is in our soul.
This adversary is an archetypal process that is within us and we can transform anyone into that, it is when we constellate our shadow in the other then he transforms into a great enemy. So we have to be careful and it is within our family, within our social groups, we exclude people from social groups, be it the church, be it the centre, whatever it may be, because there is always this desire to exclude.
During class someone asks:
Mauricio, Krish says that the cause of conflicts is attachment. Buddhism says: don’t get attached.
Christianity says that detachment can only be done with love in God, that is, attachment is not prohibited, as long as it is conveniently located. So attachment is the fundamental cause of non-salvation?
Teacher replies:
I think attachment is one of the causes, I don’t believe there is only one cause.
In this way that we are approaching here, when we are talking about the will to extermination it means attachment to your own opinion, it means attachment to your principles, it means attachment to your way of thinking, it means attachment that you are always right, it means attachment that that one kind of action cannot be forgiven, it is also in the field of attachment.
If we broaden the attachment, not only attachment in the affective sense, not only attachment in the material sense, but also attachment to the point of view, attachment to the way of being, attachment to one’s own values, attachment to the very images that are in the field of the mind, that too is included within attachment, and naturally attachment can be seen as the essential stone to be modified, to be enlarged.
I am of the opinion that every form of attachment is still a transitory form of attachment in the process of evolution, because as we evolve, we leave it aside because attachment comes from passion.
Slide 12 – The will to exterminate is in every field of life
(Teacher reads slide)
“Within the groups in which the legal order protects the individual against the will to exterminate his fellows and his own, this will sometimes moves to other areas, and manifests itself in political, scientific or ideological disputes.”
This we see too much.
Let’s take the scientific field: If there is an area that is difficult for you to limit and work on, it is the scientific area because the desire to exterminate each other, to show that the other is wrong, that it is nothing like that, that his theory is wrong, it’s huge.
You see, you follow the great advances that science has had, the group fights and the fight between scientists that occurred, not only in the correct scientific sense of showing the error, of exemplifying, but also of exterminating the other.
This also occurs within the political part, you can see that our side is always right. Pietro Ubaldi gives a class on that.
(Drawing on the blackboard) Selfishness evolves into altruism.
There’s no way, selfishness evolves into altruism.
Then Ubaldi says: How does this mechanism work? First it’s I, then this selfishness expands, then it becomes I and my family. I and my family is better than I and the other’s family.
It extends to social groups, so the group I attend, let’s say, the centre I attend is better than all the other centres.
It gives group pride: My team is better than all the other teams and the other team is the enemy.
You may not know anyone, you support a certain team there, if someone is hitting a guy you will take sides, if someone is cursing you will take sides because they are on your team.
(Drawing on the blackboard) So group pride begins, and this pride grows, and so we conquer altruism, but to that extent the will to exterminate occurs.
Look what is happening today with the football fans in Brazil, the will to exterminate you can see it clearly. Where have you ever seen someone having to argue in order to kill, to hit for a crowd?
It should be only just a joke, mockery, laughter and such, but it became a danger because the will to exterminate is what is present due to this group factor and this is expanding.
And then the person is always right.
The other cheering for the other team nowadays is already a process of extermination.
During class someone asks:
When I see this I always think that the will is already within the person. I think that this desire one has, one ends up joining this organized crowd and uses that as an escape valve, one already wanted to do that, but it needed an excuse to be able to act that way, you know?
Teacher replies:
Yes, but what I want to say is this: The will to exterminate is in all of us, not in some humans.
It’s what we’ve talked about here several times, the humanity is us.
(Drawing on the blackboard) If we are interconnected, the will to exterminate is also here.
Let’s assume, for example, that your boyfriend finds another woman. When you find out about it, and you don’t even know the girl and you say: That bastard girl, I bet, I know about her, that bitch.
Isn’t that how we’re going to talk?
You don’t even know the person, you don’t even know if the person is good, if she is being deceived, if her boyfriend is the bastard one, if it was her boyfriend who deceived her.
You don’t know anything about her, but she’s no good anymore because she actually comes in a desire to exterminate.
So, we all have this, we are humanity, there’s no way to say: I don’t have it.
Every human defect is within our soul.
(Drawing on the blackboard) What you can say is this: at the moment I am not giving priority to it and at the moment I am trying to order these contents within my soul, but we are humanity.
Anything that any human being does, we also do or have done or can do depending on the circumstances.
That’s why Jesus was so clear: Watch and pray.
Watch and pray what? Yourself.
Watch over you and pray that you do not fall into temptation.
It’s not telling you to watch the other, it’s watching yourself.
We are humanity and we are interconnected.
You say: Look, it’s been a few centuries since I’ve used this will to exterminate in the sense of actually saying it, but you can’t say you’re free of it, from one moment to the next you can create.
We are humanity.
Slide 13 – We also do the psychically extermination
(Teacher reads slide)
“That even in these areas a will to extermination is often at work is what we see whenever we abandon objectivity. Instead of seeking the best solution together, through observation and objective verification, we try to defame the representatives of the party or the opposing tendency, often with slander and insults. Such aggressions differ little from the physical will to extermination. By their feeling and by their intention they aim at the destruction of the other, at least morally, by declaring him an enemy of the group, with all the inevitable consequences.”
So when we can’t exterminate, you help to gossip.
Then you use verbal aggression that exterminates the other, that demoralizes the other, that makes the other lose strength in the environment and we see that.
You will use slander as a resource, you will use resources in every way.
And there is still the one he uses with a holy will: “Oh, I don’t like to say anything about anyone, but I heard about it”.
“I don’t judge anyone, on the contrary, I think he’s a very good person, but I’ve known this story for some time”.
Or the spiritualist who still has this shamelessness, who says like this: Oh, I think so too, he really needs our prayers.
The shamelessness even goes into prayer.
During class someone asks:
You talked all the time about this desire for extermination, the person simulating this: Ah, I’m not going to say bad things, but I do.
And the person who says: No, I don’t like him.
Teacher replies:
Simulating or not, it’s the same thing. It’s not because you talk or don’t talk that you have the greatest perversion. It’s the same defect.
Student asks:
How are you going to work this inside of you?
Teacher replies:
It has to work on yourself.
Student responds:
No, but that’s what you say: The mechanism of my defect.
Teacher replies:
That’s because you can’t forget that the defect you see in others is the defect you have and repress.
Student asks:
I’m saying it like this: When you talk about this will to exterminate, you use that same dynamic that you already taught about defects.
What do I do, What can I do, What am I able to do for this defect? It’s the same thing?
Teacher replies:
Yes, you will have to study this.
It’s the same process.
Slide 14 – In the name of justice, the will to extermination is asserted
(Teacher reads slide)
“When someone does us harm, we plan revenge. That is, to compensate we want to cause harm to that person as well. This stems from the need for compensation, therefore, the need for justice. On the other hand, however, we are also driven by the will to survive and exterminate. We want to prevent the other from hurting us and causing harm.
By taking revenge, we go beyond the need for compensation and justice and cause more suffering and damage to the other than he caused us. But the other also wants revenge and so the conflict between us never ends. Justice becomes here a pretext for revenge; in the name of justice, the will to extermination is asserted.”
This photo is wonderful, and how many times we do this, I thought the photo was spectacular.
That’s exactly it.
The will to exterminate that appears in the word, in the act, in physical aggression, that is the will to exterminate.
And that is the basis of our great family conflicts and the great conflicts between nations and between groups.
It’s the basis of these conflicts of aggression within the home, that’s the will to exterminate, and then you want it.
And it’s so true that you can see that in any process we have, we create a fight inside our heads.
Notice how many hours we spend building fights and talking to the person and complementing what one said.
“Ah, if one tells me like this and like this I will say like this and like this”.
And the conflict is settled and the conflict has no forgiveness.
When you ask the person: Okay, what does the person have to do to be forgiven?
The person doesn’t know how to speak because it doesn’t have that hypothesis, the hypothesis is of extermination.
This extermination is within our soul, of all human beings. Now if we become aware we can order this process in us.
During class someone asks:
This extermination process takes place in the material world, and so we are talking about the symbolic world as well, it takes place in the symbolic world. For example, today in Brazil we see the issue of social networks, for example, an issue related to homosexuality, so there is also this desire for extermination, but as the content constellates, we often see it falling on the very family of people who vehemently do not defend.
Teacher replies:
I mean, while we don’t give minorities rights, we suffer within our own home.
The day we embrace all minorities, giving equal expression to all of them and giving equal rights, consequently we will be able to change our social environment.
Next week we are going to continue here to study this will and I would like you to do the inner exercise: Which people do you have the desire to exterminate? And do the study of why.
So, the will to exterminate, do a study on the will to exterminate and the ‘good conscience’, the contents that we often fixate on.
Look where the good conscience is and next week we’ll talk about it again.
Guys, I want to thank you all, good night.
Original lesson produced by TV IBBIS on YouTube 06/05/2013 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8uayBQybn8&list=PLLqqrKEkP5MQx3q4Cekld95vc__jaQV16&index=6
